Weindependently evaluateall of our recommendations.
If you hit links we provide, we may receive compensation.
Running experts and real runners weigh in.
Photo:Shape / Alli Waataja
These uber-popular brands have become staples for everyone from ultra-marathoners to casual walkers and beyond.
If youve been weighing the pros and cons of Hokas versus On running shoes, you have alotto consider.
Fortunately, we know some shoe experts (and have some on staff) willing to help.
PHOTO: HOKA
When youre shopping for any shoe, your first priorities should be comfort and performance.
The shoe should be designed for what you plan on using it for.
For example, don’t buy trail shoes if most of your runs will be on pavement.
Image: Shape.
Try on several shoes in the same category from multiple brands.
You should also consider whoyouare.
Are you abeginner runner?
Do youoverpronateor deal withplantar fasciitis?
Read on below for our full analysis that settles the Hoka vs. On debate.
After much thought, weve chosen the Hoka Mach X2 for its workhorse silhouette and multitasking abilities.
These sneakers somehow manage to be lightweight, supportive, responsive, speedy, cushioned, and durable.
(We know, we know: It sounds way too good to be true.)
This model camouflages effortlessly into various activities, including running, walking, and running errands.
“The break-in period for me went very smoothly.
We also love that the meta-rocker accentuates your step and rolls you forward for maximum stability.
The barely-there feel of this model also ensures that you wont be weighed down on race day.
So many models out there are super heavy, annoyingly clunky, or just plain ugly.
That’s why we’re stoked about Hoka’s Arahi shoe.
It’s a cute, lighter-weight option for runners looking to lock their foot in place.
Like the Cliftons, the Arahis employ J-Frame technology to keep your foot from rolling inward.
They also come in wide sizes so everyone can find the right fit.
That said, weve picked the On Cloud X for its minimalistic aesthetic and five-star cushioning.
PHOTO: Urban Outfitters
We also love that these are lightweight and easy to pack in your suitcase for walking-oriented travel.
The best really comes down to what kind of runner you are.
If you love a cushioned, supportive feel, our pick is On Cloud X3 for its innovative cushioning.
PHOTO: On
Hoka and On have great marketing and solid product quality.
Celebrity endorsement has helped with the cool factor, says Neuberger.
In short, quality, buzz, and marketing lend to HOKA and Ons stellar reputation.
PHOTO: Hoka
Hoka and On both prioritize innovation and customer satisfaction.
They hear what consumers want and respond with that and so much more.
What to Know
Technology:The biggest technological difference between Hoka and On can be seeninstantly.
PHOTO: Shape / Alexander Huang
During the landing, these holes compress together to absorb shock.
Cushioning:On and Hoka have different strategies when it comes to cushioning.
HOKA is known for its robust cushioning but offers exceptions for folks who prefer sleeker, bare-bones models.
Runner or walker:Both On and Hoka prioritize creating models for all people.
Nurses in particular love Hoka for when they’restanding all daylong during shifts.
They’re a sleek option for walkers wanting to add a more utilitarian look to their wardrobe, too.
Hoka Vs. On: Which Is Better?
As you weigh your options, consider comfort, performance, fit, design, and durability.
Remember: take a stab at worry less about the brand and more about which brand and pair fitsyou.
Why Trust Shape
Kells McPhillipsis a health and wellness writer living in Los Angeles.
PHOTO: On
